⚠️ This EIP is not recommended for general use or implementation as it is likely to change.

# EIP-1459: Node Discovery via DNS Source

Author Felix Lange, Péter Szilágyi https://github.com/ethereum/devp2p/issues/50 Draft Standards Track Networking 2018-09-26 778

# Abstract

This document describes a scheme for authenticated, updateable Ethereum node lists retrievable via DNS.

# Motivation

Many Ethereum clients contain hard-coded bootstrap node lists. Updating those lists requires a software update. The current lists are small, giving the client little choice of initial entry point into the Ethereum network. We would like to maintain larger node lists containing hundreds of nodes, and update them regularly.

The scheme described here is a replacement for client bootstrap node lists with equivalent security and many additional benefits. Large lists populated by traversing the node discovery DHT can serve as a fallback option for nodes which can’t join the DHT due to restrictive network policy. DNS-based node lists may also be useful to Ethereum peering providers because their customers can configure the client to use the provider’s list.

# Specification

A ‘node list’ is a list of ‘node records’ as defined by EIP-778 of arbitrary length. Lists may refer to other lists using links. The entire list is signed using a secp256k1 private key. The corresponding public key must be known to the client in order to verify the list.

To refer to a DNS node list, clients use a URL with ‘enrtree’ scheme. The URL contains the DNS name on which the list can be found as well as the public key that signed the list. The public key is contained in the username part of the URL and is the base32 encoding of the compressed 32-byte binary public key.

Example:

enrtree://[email protected]ple.org


This URL refers to a node list at the DNS name ‘nodes.example.org’ and is signed by the public key 0x049f88229042fef9200246f49f94d9b77c4e954721442714e85850cb6d9e5daf2d880ea0e53cb3ac1a75f9923c2726a4f941f7d326781baa6380754a360de5c2b6

## DNS Record Structure

The nodes in a list are encoded as a merkle tree for distribution via the DNS protocol. Entries of the merkle tree are contained in DNS TXT records. The root of the tree is a TXT record with the following content:

enrtree-root:v1 e=<enr-root> l=<link-root> seq=<sequence-number> sig=<signature>


where

• enr-root and link-root refer to the root hashes of subtrees containing nodes and links subtrees.
• sequence-number is the tree’s update sequence number, a decimal integer.
• signature is a 65-byte secp256k1 EC signature over the keccak256 hash of the record content, excluding the sig= part, encoded as URL-safe base64.

Further TXT records on subdomains map hashes to one of three entry types. The subdomain name of any entry is the base32 encoding of the (abbreviated) keccak256 hash of its text content.

• enrtree-branch:<h₁>,<h₂>,...,<hₙ> is an intermediate tree entry containing hashes of subtree entries.
• enrtree://<key>@<fqdn> is a leaf pointing to a different list located at another fully qualified domain name. Note that this format matches the URL encoding. This type of entry may only appear in the subtree pointed to by link-root.
• enr:<node-record> is a leaf containing a node record. The node record is encoded as a URL-safe base64 string. Note that this type of entry matches the canonical ENR text encoding. It may only appear in the enr-root subtree.

No particular ordering or structure is defined for the tree. Whenever the tree is updated, its sequence number should increase. The content of any TXT record should be small enough to fit into the 512 byte limit imposed on UDP DNS packets. This limits the number of hashes that can be placed into an enrtree-branch entry.

Example in zone file format:

; name                        ttl     class type  content
@                             60      IN    TXT   enrtree-root:v1 e=JWXYDBPXYWG6FX3GMDIBFA6CJ4 l=C7HRFPF3BLGF3YR4DY5KX3SMBE seq=1 sig=o908WmNp7LibOfPsr4btQwatZJ5URBr2ZAuxvK4UWHlsB9sUOTJQaGAlLPVAhM__XJesCHxLISo94z5Z2a463gA
C7HRFPF3BLGF3YR4DY5KX3SMBE    86900   IN    TXT   enrtree://[email protected]example.org
JWXYDBPXYWG6FX3GMDIBFA6CJ4    86900   IN    TXT   enrtree-branch:2XS2367YHAXJFGLZHVAWLQD4ZY,H4FHT4B454P6UXFD7JCYQ5PWDY,MHTDO6TMUBRIA2XWG5LUDACK24
2XS2367YHAXJFGLZHVAWLQD4ZY    86900   IN    TXT   enr:-HW4QOFzoVLaFJnNhbgMoDXPnOvcdVuj7pDpqRvh6BRDO68aVi5ZcjB3vzQRZH2IcLBGHzo8uUN3snqmgTiE56CH3AMBgmlkgnY0iXNlY3AyNTZrMaECC2_24YYkYHEgdzxlSNKQEnHhuNAbNlMlWJxrJxbAFvA
H4FHT4B454P6UXFD7JCYQ5PWDY    86900   IN    TXT   enr:-HW4QAggRauloj2SDLtIHN1XBkvhFZ1vtf1raYQp9TBW2RD5EEawDzbtSmlXUfnaHcvwOizhVYLtr7e6vw7NAf6mTuoCgmlkgnY0iXNlY3AyNTZrMaECjrXI8TLNXU0f8cthpAMxEshUyQlK-AM0PW2wfrnacNI
MHTDO6TMUBRIA2XWG5LUDACK24    86900   IN    TXT   enr:-HW4QLAYqmrwllBEnzWWs7I5Ev2IAs7x_dZlbYdRdMUx5EyKHDXp7AV5CkuPGUPdvbv1_Ms1CPfhcGCvSElSosZmyoqAgmlkgnY0iXNlY3AyNTZrMaECriawHKWdDRk2xeZkrOXBQ0dfMFLHY4eENZwdufn1S1o


## Client Protocol

To find nodes at a given DNS name, say “mynodes.org”:

1. Resolve the TXT record of the name and check whether it contains a valid “enrtree-root=v1” entry. Let’s say the enr-root hash contained in the entry is “CFZUWDU7JNQR4VTCZVOJZ5ROV4”.
2. Verify the signature on the root against the known public key and check whether the sequence number is larger than or equal to any previous number seen for that name.
3. Resolve the TXT record of the hash subdomain, e.g. “CFZUWDU7JNQR4VTCZVOJZ5ROV4.mynodes.org” and verify whether the content matches the hash.
4. The next step depends on the entry type found:
• for enrtree-branch: parse the list of hashes and continue resolving them (step 3).
• for enr: decode, verify the node record and import it to local node storage.

During traversal, the client must track hashes and domains which are already resolved to avoid going into an infinite loop. It’s in the client’s best interest to traverse the tree in random order.

Client implementations should avoid downloading the entire tree at once during normal operation. It’s much better to request entries via DNS when-needed, i.e. at the time when the client is looking for peers.

# Rationale

### Why DNS?

We have chosen DNS as the distribution medium because it is always available, even under restrictive network conditions. The protocol provides low latency and answers to DNS queries can be cached by intermediate resolvers. No custom server software is needed. Node lists can be deployed to any DNS provider such as CloudFlare DNS, dnsimple, Amazon Route 53 using their respective client libraries.

### Why is this a merkle tree?

Being a merkle tree, any node list can be authenticated by a single signature on the root. Hash subdomains protect the integrity of the list. At worst intermediate resolvers can block access to the list or disallow updates to it, but cannot corrupt its content. The sequence number prevents replacing the root with an older version.

Synchronizing updates on the client side can be done incrementally, which matters for large lists. Individual entries of the tree are small enough to fit into a single UDP packet, ensuring compatibility with environments where only basic UDP DNS is available. The tree format also works well with caching resolvers: only the root of the tree needs a short TTL. Intermediate entries and leaves can be cached for days.

Links between lists enable federation and web-of-trust functionality. The operator of a large list can delegate maintenance to other list providers. If two node lists link to each other, users can use either list and get nodes from both.

The link subtree is separate from the tree containing ENRs. This is done to enable client implementations to sync these trees independently. A client wanting to get as many nodes as possible will sync the link tree first and add all linked names to the sync horizon.

# References

1. The base64 and base32 encodings used to represent binary data are defined in RFC 4648. No padding is used for base64 and base32 data.

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.