|Authors||Maurelian, Nick Johnson <[email protected]>, Alex Van de Sande <[email protected]>|
Table of Contents
- Prior work
- Initial restrictions
- Name format for hash registration
- Auctioning names
- Deployment and Upgrade process
- Registrar Interface
- Not committing to a permanent registrar at the outset
- Valid names >= 7 characters
- Restricting TLD to
- Holding ether as collateral
- Prior work
This ERC describes the implementation, as deployed to the main ethereum network on 2017-05-04, of a registrar contract to govern the allocation of names in the Ethereum Name Service (ENS). The corresponding source code is here.
For more background, refer to EIP-137.
Registrars are responsible for allocating domain names to users of the system, and are the only entities capable of updating the ENS; the owner of a node in the ENS registry is its registrar. Registrars may be contracts or externally owned accounts, though it is expected that the root and top-level registrars, at a minimum, will be implemented as contracts.
- EIP 137
A well designed and governed registrar is essential to the success of the ENS described in EIP 137, but is described separately in this document as it is external to the core ENS protocol.
In order to maximize utility and adoption of a new namespace, the registrar should mitigate speculation and “name squatting”, however the best approach for mitigation is unclear. Thus an “initial” registrar is proposed, which implements a simple approach to name allocation. During the initial period, the available namespace will be significantly restricted to the
.eth top level domain, and subdomain shorter than 7 characters in length disallowed. This specification largely describes @alexvandesande and @arachnid’s hash registrar implementation in order to facilitate discussion.
The intent is to replace the Initial Registrar contract with a permanent registrar contract. The Permanent Registrar will increase the available namespace, and incorporate lessons learned from the performance of the Initial Registrar. This upgrade is expected to take place within approximately 2 years of initial deployment.
The following factors should be considered in order to optimize for adoption of the ENS, and good governance of the Initial Registrar’s namespace.
Upgradability: The Initial Registrar should be safely upgradeable, so that knowledge gained during its deployment can be used to replace it with an improved and permanent registrar.
Effective allocation: Newly released namespaces often create a land grab situation, resulting in many potentially valuable names being purchased but unused, with the hope of re-selling at a profit. This reduces the availability of the most useful names, in turn decreasing the utility of the name service to end users.
Achieving an effective allocation may or may not require human intervention for dispute resolution and other forms of curation. The Initial Registrar should not aim to create to most effective possible allocation, but instead limit the cost of misallocation in the long term.
Security: The registrar will hold a balance of ether without an explicit limit. It must be designed securely.
Simplicity: The ENS specification itself emphasizes a separation of concerns, allowing the most essential element, the registry to be as simple as possible. The interim registrar in turn should be as simple as possible while still meeting its other design goals.
Adoption: Successful standards become more successful due to network effects. The registrar should consider what strategies will encourage the adoption of the ENS in general, and the namespace it controls in particular.
The Initial Registrar is expected to be in service for approximately two years, prior to upgrading. This should be sufficient time to learn, observe, and design an updated system.
During the initial two year period, the available name space will be restricted to the
This restriction is enforced by the owner of the ENS root node who should not assign any nodes other than
.eth to the Initial Registrar. The ENS’s root node should be controlled by multiple parties using a multisig contract.
The Initial Registrar will also prohibit registration of names 6 characters or less in length.
Names submitted to the initial registrar must be hashed using Ethereum’s sha3 function. Note that the hashes submitted to the registrar are the hash of the subdomain label being registered, not the namehash as defined in EIP 137.
For example, in order to register
abcdefg.eth, one should submit
sha3(sha3(0, 'eth'), 'abcdefg').
The registrar will allocate the available names through a Vickrey auction:
A Vickrey auction is a type of sealed-bid auction. Bidders submit written bids without knowing the bid of the other people in the auction. The highest bidder wins but the price paid is the second-highest bid. This type of auction… gives bidders an incentive to bid their true value.
The auction lifecycle of a name has 5 possible states, or Modes.
- Not-yet-available: The majority of names will be initially unavailable for auction, and will become available some time during the 8 weeks after launch.
- Open: The earliest availability for a name is determined by the most significant byte of its sha3 hash.
0x00would become available immediately,
0xFFwould become available after 8 weeks, and the availability of other names is distributed accordingly. Once a name is available, it is possible to start an auction on it.
- Auction: Once the auction for a name has begun, there is a 72 hour bidding period. Bidders must submit a payment of ether, along with sealed bids as a hash of
sha3(bytes32 hash, address owner, uint value, bytes32 salt). The bidder may obfuscate the true bid value by sending a greater amount of ether.
- Reveal: After the bidding period, a 48 hour reveal period commences. During this time, bidders must reveal the true parameters of their sealed bid. As bids are revealed, ether payments are returned according to the schedule of “refund ratios” outlined in the table below. If no bids are revealed, the name will return to the Open state.
- Owned: After the reveal period has finished, the winning bidder must submit a transaction to finalize the auction, which then calls the ENS’s
setSubnodeOwnerfunction, recording the winning bidder’s address as the owner of the hash of the name.
The following table outlines important parameters which define the Registrar’s auction mechanism.
|totalAuctionLength||The full time period from start of auction to end of the reveal period.||5 days|
|revealPeriod||The length of the time period during which bidding is no longer allowed, and bids must be revealed.||48 hours|
|launchLength||The time period during which all names will become available for auction.||8 weeks|
|minPrice||The minimum amount of ether which must be locked up in exchange for ownership of a name.||0.01 ether|
The Initial Registrar contract does not hold a balance itself. All ether sent to the Registrar will be held in a separate
Deed contracts. A deed contract is first created and funded when a sealed bid is submitted. After an auction is completed and a hash is registered, the deed for the winning bid is held in exchange for ownership of the hash. Non-winning bids are refunded.
A deed for an owned name may be transferred to another account by its owner, thus transferring ownership and control of the name.
After 1 year of registration, the owner of a hash may choose to relinquish ownership and have the value of the deed returned to them.
Deeds for non-winning bids can be closed by various methods, at which time any ether held will either be returned to the bidder, burnt, or sent to someone else as a reward for actions which help the registrar.
The following table outlines what portion of the balance held in a deed contract will be returned upon closure, and to whom. The remaining balance will be burnt.
|Reason for Deed closure||Refund Recipient||Refund Percentage|
|A valid non-winning bid is revealed.||Bidder||99.5%|
|A bid submitted after the auction period is revealed.||Bidder||99.5%|
|An otherwise valid bid is revealed on an owned name. 1||Bidder||0.5%|
|An expired sealed bid is cancelled. 2||Canceler||0.5%|
|A registered hash is reported as invalid. 3||Reporter||50%|
|A registered hash is reported as invalid. 3||Owner||50%|
- This incentivizes all bids to be revealed in time. If bids could be revealed late, an extortion attack on the current highest bidder could be made by threatening to reveal a new second highest bid.
- A bid which remains sealed after more than 2 weeks and 5 days may be cancelled by anyone to collect a small reward.
- Since names are hashed before auctioning and registration, the Initial Registrar is unable to enforce character length restrictions independently. A reward is therefore provided for reporting invalid names.
The Initial Registrar requires the ENS’s address as a constructor, and should be deployed after the ENS. The multisig account owning the root node in the ENS should then set the Initial Registrar’s address as owner of the
The Initial Registrar is expected to be replaced by a Permanent Registrar approximately 2 years after deployment. The following process should be used for the upgrade:
- The Permanent Registrar contract will be deployed.
- The multisig account owning the root node in the ENS will assign ownership of the
.ethnode to the Permanent Registrar.
- Owners of hashes in the Initial Registrar will be responsible for registering their deeds to the Permanent Registrar. A couple options are considered here:
- Require owners to transfer their ownership prior to a cutoff date in order to maintain ownership and/or continue name resolution services.
- Have the Permanent Registrar query the Initial Registrar for ownership if it is lacking an entry.
In order to limit dependence on the Initial Registrar, new auctions will stop after 4 years, and all ether held in deeds after 8 years will become unreachable.
function state(bytes32 _hash) constant returns (Mode)
- Implements a state machine returning the current state of a name
function entries(bytes32 _hash) constant returns (Mode, address, uint, uint, uint)
- Returns the following information regarding a registered name:
- deed address
- registration date
- balance of the deed
- highest value bid at auction
function getAllowedTime(bytes32 _hash) constant returns (uint timestamp)
- Returns the time at which the hash will no longer be in the initial
function isAllowed(bytes32 _hash, uint _timestamp) constant returns (bool allowed)
- Takes a hash and a time, returns true if and only if it has passed the initial
function startAuction(bytes32 _hash);
- Moves the state of a hash from Open to Auction. Throws if state is not Open.
function startAuctions(bytes32 _hashes);
- Starts multiple auctions on an array of hashes. This enables someone to open up an auction for a number of dummy hashes when they are only really interested in bidding for one. This will increase the cost for an attacker to simply bid blindly on all new auctions. Dummy auctions that are open but not bid on are closed after a week.
function shaBid(bytes32 hash, address owner, uint value, bytes32 salt) constant returns (bytes32 sealedBid);
- Takes the parameters of a bid, and returns the sealedBid hash value required to participate in the bidding for an auction. This obfuscates the parameters in order to mimic the mechanics of placing a bid in an envelope.
function newBid(bytes32 sealedBid);
- Bids are sent by sending a message to the main contract with a sealedBid hash and an amount of ether. The hash contains information about the bid, including the bidded name hash, the bid value, and a random salt. Bids are not tied to any one auction until they are revealed. The value of the bid itself can be masqueraded by sending more than the value of your actual bid. This is followed by a 48h reveal period. Bids revealed after this period will be burned and the ether unrecoverable. Since this is an auction, it is expected that most public hashes, like known domains and common dictionary words, will have multiple bidders pushing the price up.
function startAuctionsAndBid(bytes32 hashes, bytes32 sealedBid)
- A utility function allowing a call to
newBidin a single transaction.
function unsealBid(bytes32 _hash, address _owner, uint _value, bytes32 _salt);
- Once the bidding period is completed, there is a reveal period during with the properties of a bid are submitted to reveal them. The registrar hashes these properties using the
shaBid()function above to verify that they match a pre-existing sealed bid. If the unsealedBid is the new best bid, the old best bid is returned to its bidder.
function cancelBid(bytes32 seal);
- Cancels an unrevealed bid according to the rules described in the notes on the refund schedule above.
function finalizeAuction(bytes32 _hash);
After the registration date has passed, this function can be called to finalize the auction, which then calls the ENS function
setSubnodeOwner() updating the ENS record to set the winning bidder as owner of the node.
function transfer(bytes32 _hash, address newOwner);
- Update the owner of the ENS node corresponding to the submitted hash to a new owner. This function must be callable only by the current owner.
function releaseDeed(bytes32 _hash);
- After some time, the owner can release the property and get their ether back.
function invalidateName(string unhashedName);
- Since registration is done on the hash of a name, the registrar itself cannot validate names. This function can be used to report a name which is 6 characters long or less. If it has been registered, the submitter will earn 10% of the deed value. We are purposefully handicapping the simplified registrar as a way to force it into being restructured in a few years.
function eraseNode(bytes32 labels)
- Allows anyone to delete the owner and resolver records for a subdomain of a name that is not currently owned in the registrar. For instance, to zero
foo.bar.ethon a registrar that owns
.eth, pass an array containing
function transferRegistrars(bytes32 _hash) onlyOwner(_hash);
- Used during the upgrade process to a permanent registrar. If this registrar is no longer the owner of the its root node in the ENS, this function will transfers the deed to the current owner, which should be a new registrar. This function throws if this registrar still owns its root node.
Anticipating and designing for all the potential issues of name allocation names is unlikely to succeed. This approach chooses not to be concerned with getting it perfect, but allows us to observe and learn with training wheels on, and implement improvements before expanding the available namespace to shorter names or another TLD.
Preserving the shortest, and often most valuable, domain names for the upgraded registrar provides the opportunity to implement processes for dispute resolution (assuming they are found to be necessary).
A slower release allows for extra time to identify, and address any issues which may arise after launch.
Choosing a single TLD helps to maximize network effects by focusing on one namespace.
A three letter TLD is a pattern made familiar by it’s common usage in internet domain names. This familiarity significantly increases the potential of the ENS to be integrated into pre-existing DNS systems, and reserved as a special-use domain name. A recent precedent for this is the reservation of the
This approach is simpler than the familiar model of requiring owners to make recurring payments to retain ownership of a domain name. It also makes the initial registrar a revenue neutral service.
This document borrows heavily from several sources:
- EIP-137 outlines the initial implementation of the Registry Contract (ENS.sol) and associated Resolver contracts.
- ERC-26 was the first ERC to propose a name service at the contract layer
- @alexvandesande’s current implementation of the HashRegistrar
- 2016-10-26 Added link Alex’s design in abstract
- 2016-11-01 change ‘Planned deactivation’ to h3’
- 2017-03-13 Update timelines for bidding and reveal periods
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
Please cite this document as:
Maurelian, Nick Johnson <[email protected]>, Alex Van de Sande <[email protected]>, "EIP-162: Initial ENS Hash Registrar," Ethereum Improvement Proposals, no. 162, October 2016. [Online serial]. Available: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-162.