Introduce an explicit value range for certain EVM parameters
(such as gas limit, block number, block timestamp, size field when returning/copying data within EVM).
Some of these already have an implicit value range due to various (practical) reasons.
Motivation
Having such an explicit value range can help in creating compatible client implementations,
in certain cases it can also offer minor speed improvements,
and can reduce the effort needed to create consensus critical test cases
by eliminating unrealistic edge cases.
Specification
If block.number >= {FORK_BLOCK}, the following value ranges are introduced.
They restrict the results (i.e. values pushed to the stack) of the instructions listed below.
gas, gas limit, block gas limit
is a range between 0 and 0x7fffffffffffffff (2**63 - 1, 9223372036854775807).
It affects the following instructions:
GASLIMIT (0x45),
GAS (0x5a).
block number, timestamp
is a range between 0 and 0x7fffffffffffffff (2**63 - 1, 9223372036854775807).
It affects the following instructions:
TIMESTAMP (0x42),
NUMBER (0x43).
account address
is a range between 0 and 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff (2**160 - 1, 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542975)
i.e. the address occupies the 160 low bits of the 256-bit value and the remaining top 96 bits must be zeros.
It affects the following instructions:
ADDRESS (0x30),
ORIGIN (0x32),
CALLER (0x33),
COINBASE (0x41),
CREATE (0xf0),
CREATE2 (0xf5).
buffer size, code size, memory size
is a range between 0 and 0xffffffff (2**32 - 1, 4294967295).
It affects the following instructions:
and implicitly also allowed by certain assumptions, such as due to gas limits some of these values cannot grow past a certain limit
Most of the limits proposed in this document have been previously explored and tested in EVMC.
Using the 2**63 - 1 constant to limit some of the ranges:
allows using signed 64-bit integer type to represent it,
what helps programming languages not having unsigned types,
makes arithmetic simpler (e.g. checking out-of-gas conditions is simple as gas_counter < 0).
Timestamp
The Yellow Paper defines the timestamp in block as “A scalar value equal to the reasonable output of Unix’s time() at this block’s inception”.
IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (POSIX.1) leaves that definition implementation defined.
Addresses
The size of addresses is specified in the Yellow Paper as 20 bytes.
E.g. the COINBASE instruction is specified to return Hc ∈ 𝔹20 which has 20 bytes.
Memory size
Memory expansion cost is not linear and is determined by the following formula:
cost = cost_per_word * number_of_words + (number_of_words ^ 2 / 512)
Expanding to over 2^32 - 1 bytes would cost 35184774742016 gas. This number fits into the gas limit imposed above (2 ^ 63 - 1) and would cost around 35184 Ether in a transaction to exhaust, with a 1 GWei gas cost, which can be attained on mainnet.
However, setting the limit 2^32 - 1 is beneficial from a VM design perspective and we believe limiting memory should be done via carefully selecting the block gas limit.
Code size
EIP-170 has implemented a code size limit of 0x6000, however even before that, it was practically impossible to deploy a code blob exceeding 2**32 - 1 bytes in size.
Comparing current implementations
Timestamp is implemented as a 64-bit value in Aleth, geth and Parity
Block gas limit is implemented as a 64-bit in Aleth and geth
Memory, buffer and code sizes are implemented as 64-bit values in geth
Backwards Compatibility
All of these limits are already enforced mostly through the block gas limit. Since the out of range case results in a transaction failure, there should not be a change in behaviour.
Test Cases
TBA
Implementation
TBA
References
EIP-92 proposed the transaction gas limit to be limited at 2**63 - 1 and had a lengthy discussion about other limits.
EIP-106 proposed the block gas limit to be limited at 2**63 - 1.
TODO
Does the gas limit apply to the gas argument for call instructions?
Alex Beregszaszi (@axic), Paweł Bylica (@chfast), "EIP-1985: Sane limits for certain EVM parameters [DRAFT]," Ethereum Improvement Proposals, no. 1985, August 2018. [Online serial]. Available: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1985.