Extends tokens using uint256 tokenId to support tokenName in type string and be able to convert backward to tokenId.
Motivation
For Marketplaces, Explorers, Wallets, DeFi and dApps to better display and operate NFTs that comes with a name.
Specification
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
Compliant contracts MUST support tokenName and
mapping between tokenName and tokenId in one of the following ways:
1a all compliant contracts are RECOMMENDED to implement the following
interfaces: IERC_NamedTokenCore,
and it should satisfy the behavior rules that:
- 1a.1. when a new name is instroduced, it is RECOMMENDED to emit an event newName(uint256 indexed tokenId, string tokenName).
- 1a.2. tokenId and tokenName MUST be two-way single mapping, meaning if tokenId exists, tokenName MUST exist and vice versa and
tokenId = nameToId(idToName(tokenId)) and
tokenName = idToName(nameToId(tokenName)) MUST hold true.
1b. if the compliant doesn’t implement IERC_NamedTokenCore,
it MAY follow the default mapping rule between tokenId and tokenNameuint256 tokenId = uint256(keccak256(tokenName)).
All method involving tokenId for a compliant contract is RECOMMENDED to
have a counterpart method end with ByName that substitute all
pamameters of uint256 tokenId with string memory tokenName,
and the behavior of the counterpart method MUST be consistent
with the original method.
Compliant contract MAY implement one or more of following extra interface
We allow default way to map tokenId and tokenName for convenience, but
we also allow contract to implement their own way to map tokenId and
tokenName for flexibility.
We consider providing an interface for
Backwards Compatibility
This proposal is fully backwards compatible with token contracts using
uint256 tokenId as the unique identifier.
Security Considerations
This proposal assume that both tokenName and tokenId are
unique amongst all tokens.
If tokenNames are not normalize, two distinct tokenNames may confuse users
as they look alike. Contract developer shall declare normalization mechanism if
non-unique tokenName is allowed using IERC_NamedTokenExtension.