EIP-7976 Empirical Report (64/64 Pricing at the Floor)

The following represents a summary with empirical findings from analyzing EIP-7976’s impact on transactions. Date: January, 2026

Dataset

  • Period: 150 days of Ethereum mainnet data (August 2025 - January 2026)
  • Blocks analyzed: 1,080,000 blocks
  • Total transactions: 245,624,335

Overall Impact Metrics

Transaction Impact Summary

Metric Value
Total unaffected transactions 240,588,721 (97.95%)
Total affected transactions 5,035,614 (2.05%)
Transactions already affected by EIP-7623 2,093,004 (0.85%)
New transactions affected by EIP-7976 only 2,942,610 (1.20%)
EIP-7623 overlap percentage 41.6%

Address Distribution

Metric Value
Unique affected senders 636,577
Unique affected recipients 521,874
Avg transactions per affected sender 7.91
Avg transactions per affected recipient 9.65

Gas Usage Analysis (Affected Transactions)

Basic Gas Metrics

Metric Value
Mean gas used 140,959
Median gas used 38,031
Average calldata bytes 3,460
Average zero bytes 1,883
Average non-zero bytes 1,577

Most Affected Senders

Top 30 Senders by Additional Cost Impact

Rank Address Transactions Total Cost Increase (gas) Avg Cost/Tx Etherscan Link
1 0x54b839d988c9e712cd36cbf7c95dedc2b9f9ae6c 44,296 100,215,386,242 2,262,402 View
2 0xcbe6fbf5e3c427013688e04d0fde56705890c4be 27,031 93,199,568,422 3,447,877 View
3 0xe08cdadd44440e32ef153956a7ec40804a32dd74 3,360 24,782,661,408 7,375,792 View
4 0xc17ea94008d5a8ee86f120e092cd35a679166416 59,548 12,647,040,432 212,383 View
5 0x148ee7daf16574cd020afa34cc658f8f3fbd2800 4,409 11,475,576,948 2,602,761 View
6 0x16f09b37b20bfbb07130bba8226299926e39b488 14,598 9,858,634,629 675,341 View
7 0x6860c4ee678d847ae67771f2e5eea96ccb7fdf8d 81,588 8,129,909,932 99,645 View
8 0xf4ceb19b2467ef784b5e83b863418c50997b1646 18,119 7,588,481,162 418,813 View
9 0x646c4fbdf82b5766c5eaf1fab9a8927fb5992d38 118,451 7,384,356,334 62,341 View
10 0x0373b1ed3b9e601bb8b17afde70b0ccab76a981d 158,514 7,277,663,018 45,911 View
11 0xe2da046340e00264c4f0443243a0565007ae08ac 3,944 5,940,541,350 1,506,222 View
12 0xa7ec2be4ed79ef315b4301aeca424a2dfdeaf09a 65,856 5,616,659,491 85,286 View
13 0x7835fb36a8143a014a2c381363cd1a4dee586d2a 2,887 5,601,056,603 1,940,095 View
14 0xf2099c4783921f44ac988b67e743daefd4a00efd 1,436 4,201,896,151 2,926,111 View
15 0x7804405f18e134c3c47d71ae02eb454d25722d88 678 4,153,379,856 6,125,928 View
16 0xfe9dcec48761d2826e3e3d95597462dfb281db79 48,221 4,047,228,659 83,930 View
17 0x1346d9c6315f6c23fe280b49ef215aebd49338b2 6,211 3,673,122,501 591,389 View
18 0x5f62d006c10c009ff50c878cd6157ac861c99990 7,952 3,655,219,300 459,660 View
19 0x3f773dc3ccc70b3d2a549713ac8d556af949d4e8 1,323 3,653,595,781 2,761,599 View
20 0xc8a5849a02ad01b572a0108aebf5a0d27777a552 63,707 3,484,943,560 54,702 View
21 0x30c2f77eaa93aace5e56ea4dcba5f21f794b58be 687 3,326,641,119 4,842,272 View
22 0xcbeb5d484b54498d3893a0c3eb790331962e9e9d 7,602 2,716,498,081 357,339 View
23 0xd312535f0104a45ebd16cd29756fe9e6f8fe633c 42,892 2,461,082,112 57,378 View
24 0xb947d63b578fb48233de4076407dd0498dcf36ab 584 2,431,099,134 4,162,840 View
25 0x1c9a7a489f62a75e276d3790ba92aaf12af13469 6,923 2,145,392,271 309,893 View
26 0xf3d021d51a725f5dbdce253248e826a8644be3c1 3,693 2,063,909,478 558,870 View
27 0x2b4820042fe6a5b8ab01b29ede19203181d625fa 18,285 1,880,349,910 102,835 View
28 0xf6309d5a91fa559cbf8f6ff3c5ec8fb67fe38577 628 1,830,917,976 2,915,474 View
29 0x000cb000e880a92a8f383d69da2142a969b93de7 5,223 1,787,396,594 342,216 View
30 0x785cd82bb016c740d41ca9e0b1bacc3a2439dc0d 23,798 1,666,264,939 70,017 View

Key Observations

  • Top single address (0x54b839d988c9e712cd36cbf7c95dedc2b9f9ae6c) accounts for 19.6% of all additional costs with 44,296 transactions
  • Highest volume address (0x0373b1ed3b9e601bb8b17afde70b0ccab76a981d) has 158,514 affected transactions but only 45,911 gas average increase per transaction
  • Highest per-transaction impact (0xe08cdadd44440e32ef153956a7ec40804a32dd74) shows 7.4M gas average increase per transaction

Cost Impact

Metric Value
Mean cost increase per transaction 101,489.08 gas units
Median cost increase per transaction 11,444 gas units

Address Concentration Analysis

Transaction Distribution

Address Group Count Percentage
1 affected transaction 388,216 60.98%
≤10 affected transactions 611,619 96.08%
≤50 affected transactions 632,916 99.43%
≤100 affected transactions 634,730 99.71%
≤200 affected transactions 635,491 99.83%
≤400 affected transactions 635,926 99.90%

Transaction Volume Concentration

Top Addresses % of Affected Transactions
Top 10 26.79%
Top 20 33.47%
Top 30 37.17%
Top 40 39.70%
Top 50 41.76%

Transaction Volume by Percentiles

Address Percentile % of Affected Transactions
Top 10% 47.70%
Top 20% 54.00%
Top 30% 56.74%
Top 40% 58.57%
Top 50% 59.92%

Cost Impact Concentration

Top Addresses % of Additional Costs
Top 10 55.28%
Top 20 63.90%
Top 30 68.26%
Top 40 71.15%
Top 50 73.64%

Cost Impact by Percentiles

Address Percentile % of Additional Costs
Top 1% 91.44%
Top 10% 97.31%
Top 20% 98.75%
Top 30% 99.40%
Top 40% 99.72%
Top 50% 99.87%

Method Analysis

Top 20 Affected Function Selectors

Rank Function Selector Transactions Total Cost Increase Avg Cost/Tx Method Name
1 0x5578ceae 28,355 94,835,044,230 3,343,786 registerContinuousMemoryPage(…)
2 0x538f9406 27,826 93,972,171,674 3,377,149 updateState(uint256[],uint256[])
3 0x87201b41 70,794 26,600,051,568 375,772 fulfillAvailableAdvancedOrders(…)
4 0x5e10b3f0 379,355 22,244,424,770 58,646 workMyDirefulOwner(uint256,uint256)
5 0xfd9f1e10 191,576 18,205,559,712 95,012 cancel(…)
6 0xf074ba62 3,827 9,634,717,355 2,517,565 verifyCheckpointProofs(…)
7 0x09c5eabe 42,105 8,765,393,130 208,186 execute(bytes)
8 0x6fadcf72 72,208 5,516,170,528 76,366 forward(address,bytes)
9 0xe85a6a28 16,654 4,985,983,858 299,377 verifyFRI(…)
10 0x415e2848 74,876 3,076,701,516 41,091 swap_6269342730()
11 0x3fe317a6 7,137 2,743,013,450 384,350 verifyMerkle(…)
12 0x55944a42 35,064 2,610,534,480 74,445 matchAdvancedOrders(…)
13 0x82ad56cb 19,638 2,582,341,458 131,491 aggregate3((address,bool,bytes)[])
14 0xe7acab24 25,484 2,080,247,964 81,621 fulfillAdvancedOrder(…)
15 0x13d79a0b 21,713 1,555,462,876 71,652 settleOrders(bytes)
16 0xbb2f45e1 4,214 1,061,775,096 251,964 submitV1(…)
17 0x64971c46 13,972 1,002,671,000 71,750 swap(…)
18 0x4c2c47bd 630 931,755,480 1,478,976 bulkRegisterValidator(…)

Key Methods by Category

Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems

  • registerContinuousMemoryPage: 28,355 txs, avg 3,343,786 gas increase
  • updateState: 27,826 txs, avg 3,377,149 gas increase
  • verifyCheckpointProofs: 3,827 txs, avg 2,517,565 gas increase
  • verifyFRI: 16,654 txs, avg 299,377 gas increase
  • verifyMerkle: 7,137 txs, avg 384,350 gas increase

NFT Marketplace Operations

  • fulfillAvailableAdvancedOrders: 70,794 txs, avg 375,772 gas increase
  • matchAdvancedOrders: 35,064 txs, avg 74,445 gas increase
  • fulfillAdvancedOrder: 25,484 txs, avg 81,621 gas increase
  • cancel: 191,576 txs, avg 95,012 gas increase

Multi-signature/Proxy Operations

  • forward: 72,208 txs, avg 76,366 gas increase
  • execute: 42,105 txs, avg 208,186 gas increase
  • aggregate3: 19,638 txs, avg 131,491 gas increase

EIP-7623 Interaction Analysis

Linear Cost Increase

The analysis reveals that 41.6% of transactions affected by EIP-7976 are already impacted by EIP-7623. This means:

  • 2,093,004 transactions (0.85% of all transactions) will experience linear cost increases as calldata pricing moves from EIP-7623 rates to EIP-7976 rates
  • 2,942,610 transactions (1.20% of all transactions) represent new impact from EIP-7976

Pricing Structure Comparison

Byte Type Current EIP-7623 EIP-7976 7623→7976 Increase
Zero bytes 4 gas 10 gas 64 gas +54 gas (540%)
Non-zero bytes 16 gas 40 gas 64 gas +24 gas (60%)

Key Findings

  1. High Concentration: Cost impact is extremely concentrated with top 1% of addresses responsible for 91.44% of additional costs

  2. EIP-7623 Linear Escalation: A significant portion of affected transactions (41.6%) will see linear cost increases from existing EIP-7623 pricing

  3. Address Distribution: 60.98% of affected addresses have only 1 affected transaction, indicating diverse but minimal user impact

  4. Methods: Impact is dominated by zero-knowledge proof operations and NFT marketplace operations, with additional impact from multi-signature/proxy operations

  5. Cost Variance: Median increase (11,444 gas) vs mean increase (101,489.08 gas) shows high variance in impact severity

  6. Broader Impact: With 64/64 pricing, 2.05% of transactions are affected (vs 1.48% with 15/60 pricing), representing a 38.5% increase in affected transaction count